Bank Notes

  • Home
  • News
  • Administration
  • Agency and Mandate
  • Bonds and Notes
  • Cheques and bills
  • Companies
  • Confidentiality
  • Consumer credit
  • Contract
  • Conversion
  • Data Protection
  • Default and demand
  • Documentary credits
  • Fiduciary duties
  • Financial Services Regulation
  • Fraud and economic torts
  • Guarantees and indemnities
  • Hire and asset finance
  • Injunctions
  • Insurance
  • Joint and vicarious liability
  • Limitation
  • Mistake
  • Money Laundering
  • Negligence and Advisory Liability
  • Partnership
  • Procedure
  • Receivership
  • Security
  • Trust and Accessory Liability
  • Unjust enrichment


A - ADR


24/7/13

BINNS v FIRSTPLUS FINANCIAL GROUP PLC [2013] EWHC 2436 (QB), [2014] Bus LR 110

The claimants made a claim regarding mis-sold payment protection insurance under the former Financial Services Authority ADR scheme and received an award.  They then brought a county court claim essentially to recover the legal costs they had incurred because the ADR scheme gave no award of costs.  The claim was struck out.  Redress had already been offered by the ADR route and the pursuit of costs alone was an “illegitimate factor”.




© Copyright 2013 Neil Levy All Rights Reserved. Disclaimer