Bank Notes

  • Home
  • News
  • Administration
  • Agency and Mandate
  • Bonds and Notes
  • Cheques and bills
  • Companies
  • Confidentiality
  • Consumer credit
  • Contract
  • Conversion
  • Data Protection
  • Default and demand
  • Documentary credits
  • Fiduciary duties
  • Financial Services Regulation
  • Fraud and economic torts
  • Guarantees and indemnities
  • Hire and asset finance
  • Injunctions
  • Insurance
  • Joint and vicarious liability
  • Limitation
  • Mistake
  • Money Laundering
  • Negligence and Advisory Liability
  • Partnership
  • Procedure
  • Receivership
  • Security
  • Trust and Accessory Liability
  • Unjust enrichment


B - Bailment 


5/6/20

SCIPION ACTIVE TRADING FUND v VALLIS GROUP LTD [2020] EWHC 1451 (Comm)

Considers the right of a possessor or bailee of goods to sue for damages for loss of the goods [74] and the applicable law in cases of claims to possession of goods [88].  In the case of contractual bailment, the applicable law is the law governing the contract [91].  Considers whether a contract of bailment precludes the bailee from denying the bailor’s title and right to possession [101].  The Torts (Interference with Goods) Act 1977 does not extend to contractual claims where concurrent liability exists in contract and tort or bailment.  It only applies to claims in tort [108].  Considers when a party is estopped from denying the validity of security [119].  On the facts a pledge was valid under the applicable law [214].  Considers the measure of loss recoverable by a pledgee [219], valuation and mitigation [239].