Bank Notes

  • Home
  • News
  • Administration
  • Agency and Mandate
  • Bonds and Notes
  • Cheques and bills
  • Companies
  • Confidentiality
  • Consumer credit
  • Contract
  • Conversion
  • Data Protection
  • Default and demand
  • Documentary credits
  • Fiduciary duties
  • Financial Services Regulation
  • Fraud and economic torts
  • Guarantees and indemnities
  • Hire and asset finance
  • Injunctions
  • Insurance
  • Joint and vicarious liability
  • Limitation
  • Mistake
  • Money Laundering
  • Negligence and Advisory Liability
  • Partnership
  • Procedure
  • Receivership
  • Security
  • Trust and Accessory Liability
  • Unjust enrichment


B - Burden of proof

8/3/24

BRENDON INTERNATIONAL LTD v WATER PLUS LTD [2024] EWCA Civ 220

Explains the distinction between the legal and evidential burden of proof [50].  In a claim for recovery of money paid by mistake, the legal burden of proof is on the claimant.  The judge had wrongly confused the two and wrongly applied a presumption.  The appeal court explained when a person may be regarded as qualified to give expert evidence [75] and when a witness can give evidence of fact and opinion [86].   The judge had failed to give sufficient reasons for refusing to treat a witness as an expert.  The court also considered what reasonable diligence means in the context of Limitation Act 1980, s.32 [94].  The judge had not asked the right question, which involves asking what the actual claimant could have learned not just what they did learn.