Bank Notes

  • Home
  • News
  • Administration
  • Agency and Mandate
  • Bonds and Notes
  • Cheques and bills
  • Companies
  • Confidentiality
  • Consumer credit
  • Contract
  • Conversion
  • Data Protection
  • Default and demand
  • Documentary credits
  • Fiduciary duties
  • Financial Services Regulation
  • Fraud and economic torts
  • Guarantees and indemnities
  • Hire and asset finance
  • Injunctions
  • Insurance
  • Joint and vicarious liability
  • Limitation
  • Mistake
  • Money Laundering
  • Negligence and Advisory Liability
  • Partnership
  • Procedure
  • Receivership
  • Security
  • Trust and Accessory Liability
  • Unjust enrichment


D - Damages adequate


23/8/17

WEST END COMMERCIAL LIMITED v LONDON TROCADERO (2015) LLP [2017] EWHC 2175 (Ch)

The court refused to continue an interim injunction restraining termination of a licence to occupy premises.  On the current state of the law, (set out in Thorner v Major, 2009) proprietary estoppel could not be relied upon to support a claim to a contractual licence which did not confer a proprietary interest in property.  Nor had detriment been made out on the facts of the case.  Damages would also have been an adequate remedy. 


6/3/14

AB v CD [2014] EWCA Civ 229

Where recoverable damages were limited or excluded by a contractual provision, an applicant for an interim injunction can properly argue that damages would not be an adequate remedy for a threatened breach of contract.




© Copyright 2014 Neil Levy All Rights Reserved. Disclaimer