Bank Notes

  • Home
  • News
  • Administration
  • Agency and Mandate
  • Bonds and Notes
  • Cheques and bills
  • Companies
  • Confidentiality
  • Consumer credit
  • Contract
  • Conversion
  • Data Protection
  • Default and demand
  • Documentary credits
  • Fiduciary duties
  • Financial Services Regulation
  • Fraud and economic torts
  • Guarantees and indemnities
  • Hire and asset finance
  • Injunctions
  • Insurance
  • Joint and vicarious liability
  • Limitation
  • Mistake
  • Money Laundering
  • Negligence and Advisory Liability
  • Partnership
  • Procedure
  • Receivership
  • Security
  • Trust and Accessory Liability
  • Unjust enrichment


December 2014


19/12/14

BARNETT v CREGGY [2014] EWHC 3080 (Ch)

Claim for an account against a solicitor and defence of limitation.


16/12/14

R (HYSAJ) v SECRETARY OF STATE FOR THE HOME DEPARTMENT [2014] EWCA Civ 1633

The Denton principles for relief from sanction apply to applications to appeal out of time.  Shortage of funds or inability to pay for legal representation is not good reason for delay [43], nor does the mere fact of being unrepresented provide good reason for not adhering to the rules [44].  Only in those cases where the court can see without much investigation that the grounds of appeal are either very strong or very weak will the merits have a significant part to play when it comes to balancing the various factors that have to be considered [46].


12/12/14

WALSHAM CHALET PARK LTD v TALLINGTON LAKES LTD [2014] EWCA Civ 1607

The principles in Denton v White for relief from sanction apply to applications to strike out a claim for non-compliance with a court order.


© Copyright 2014 Neil Levy All Rights Reserved. Disclaimer