Bank Notes

  • Home
  • News
  • Administration
  • Agency and Mandate
  • Bonds and Notes
  • Cheques and bills
  • Companies
  • Confidentiality
  • Consumer credit
  • Contract
  • Conversion
  • Data Protection
  • Default and demand
  • Documentary credits
  • Fiduciary duties
  • Financial Services Regulation
  • Fraud and economic torts
  • Guarantees and indemnities
  • Hire and asset finance
  • Injunctions
  • Insurance
  • Joint and vicarious liability
  • Limitation
  • Mistake
  • Money Laundering
  • Negligence and Advisory Liability
  • Partnership
  • Procedure
  • Receivership
  • Security
  • Trust and Accessory Liability
  • Unjust enrichment


O - Overriding objective


16/4/15

KAZAKHSTAN KAGAZY PLC v ZHUNUS [2015] EWHC 996 (Comm)

The court ordered a claimant company to provide £1m security for costs, principally in view of the apparent weakness of its claim.  The court made observations that parties should avoid heated exchanges in correspondence, exclude imputations that are not objectively justifiable and strictly necessary, focus on working out a timetable, agree facts and issues to ensure court time is used efficiently, and avoid taking points which do not significantly advance a party’s case or which will take up a disproportionate amount of time [3].




© Copyright 2015 Neil Levy All Rights Reserved. Disclaimer