Bank Notes

  • Home
  • News
  • Administration
  • Agency and Mandate
  • Bonds and Notes
  • Cheques and bills
  • Companies
  • Confidentiality
  • Consumer credit
  • Contract
  • Conversion
  • Data Protection
  • Default and demand
  • Documentary credits
  • Fiduciary duties
  • Financial Services Regulation
  • Fraud and economic torts
  • Guarantees and indemnities
  • Hire and asset finance
  • Injunctions
  • Insurance
  • Joint and vicarious liability
  • Limitation
  • Mistake
  • Money Laundering
  • Negligence and Advisory Liability
  • Partnership
  • Procedure
  • Receivership
  • Security
  • Trust and Accessory Liability
  • Unjust enrichment


T- Tenant

 

11/7/13

PARATUS AMC LTD v FOSUHENE [2013] EWCA Civ 827

The defendant occupied property under a tenancy purportedly granted without the claimant mortgagee’s consent.  The court considered the principles to be applied when deciding whether the mortgagee had treated the tenant as its own [27].  Although the defendant had made payments directly to the mortgagee since 2009, the mortgagee was not bound by the tenancy because the defendant had not discharged the burden of proving that the mortgagee knew the payments were coming from the defendant as tenant rather than as payments on behalf of the mortgagor.


© Copyright 2013 Neil Levy All Rights Reserved. Disclaimer